|
|
Dynamic Multi-Gear Power Design |
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Power
Efficiency
(%)
|
| |
up to
20%
Higher power
efficiency during
light loading |
|
Dynamic Multi-Gear Power Design
Only multi-gear switching provides optimum power efficiency from light to heavy loading. |
 |
Gear1
shift to
Gear2
|
Gear2
shift to
Gear3
|
Gear3
shift to
Gear4
|
Gear4
shift to
Gear5 |
|
High
power efficiency |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
light loading |
Heavy loading |
|
I(A) |
| |
Gear1 |
Gear2 |
Gear3 |
Gear4 |
Gear5 |
GIGABYTE Multi-Gear Switching |
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Less Efficient 2-Gear or 1-Gear Power Design
Gaps in power efficiency occur with 2-Gear or 1-Gear switching design. |
| |
2-Gear Switching Power Efficiency loss
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1-Gear Power Efficiency loss |
| |
light loading |
Heavy loading |
|
I(A) |
| |
GIGABYTE Multi-Gear Switching |
Other 2-Gear Switching |
Other 1-Gear Design |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
Power
Efficiency
(%) |
| |
Low
power efficiency during light loading |
|
Less Efficient 2-Gear Power Design |
| 2-gear switching provides low power efficiency during light loading. |
Gear1
shift to
Gear2 |
|
Low
power efficiency |
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
light loading |
Heavy loading |
|
I(A) |
| |
Gear1 |
Gear2 |
Other 2-Gear Switching |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |